![]() |
| homeless man at a clinic |
The homeless in our society often
suffer from a lack of healthcare services. While it is true that many homeless refuse medical care due to addictions, low cognitive function,
mistrust of people of authority or intellectual disabilities there are still
those that desire to seek care but cannot. If a person were to view this
problem with a cold cursory look they might conclude that "you can lead a
horse to water but you can't make them drink". While this may be a
true statement it does not release a modern society from fulfilling its
obligation to its citizens. Would we consider allowing an elderly person
with dementia knowingly walk into traffic? Would
we sit by and allow a sick child to forgo going to the doctor because they
"don't like the taste of the medicine?" Surely not! Yet, we allow a homeless person caught
up in addiction or low cognitive skills to deteriorate before our eyes while
doing nothing? Tragically, that is what many communities do. It
is at this crossroads that we find an ethical dilemma. APA Ethical Standards would indicate our failure as a society to cause no harm, Principle A: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence.
![]() |
| "Everybody avoids me!" |
Of those homeless that eventually
make their way into the lobby of a doctor’s office or Emergency Room they often
perceive a sense of not being welcome. People stop and stare.
People don't engage them in conversation like other patrons; People take a wide
girth around them as though they have some terrible disease. These unwelcome signs are generally not spoken words but by how people react. Others change seats, stare, hold their noses or move their children away.
"They smell, they are scary, they might try to hurt me, I don't want them touching
me" fellow patrons remark when asked. In 2007 a
study was done of homeless perceptions of being welcomed at health care
facilities in Toronto, Canada. Perceptions there should be even more
diminished than in the U.S. since the entire issue of healthcare coverage would
be void due to socialized medicine in Canada. Yet, even in that setting
the homeless people surveyed over 60% felt unwelcome and avoided (Wen, Hudak
& Hwang, 2007).
In
many communities far more concern is placed on a stray dog dodging in and out
of traffic than a homeless person slowing cars down as they attempt to push
their grocery cart containing all they own across the street. Principle B, Fidelity and Responsibility is also violated as we fail to be faithful to the most vulnerable.
Finally, I believe Principle E, Respect for People's Right's and Dignity is violated in this situation as well. Our communities have failed
to treat the homeless with respect and recognizing their rights afforded them
under the law and by most moral and ethical codes.
References
Shane,
P. G. (1996). What about America's homeless children? Hide and seek.
Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Wen, C.K., Hudak, P.L.,
Hwang, S.W. (2007). Journal of General Internal Medicine, July, 2007, Volume
22, Issue 7, pp. 1011-1017, 06 April 2007.


It is interesting, your comment about a stray dog getting more care than a homeless person. I often think about that. If I post a kitten that need adoption I get 70 likes and 25 comments. If I post on facebook an issue about a person or cause, it might get 3 likes. We have more emotion and compassion towards animals. Why? I like how you are weaving aspects of the APA Ethics Principles and Codes into this blog and this is exactly what I was looking for.
ReplyDeleteThank goodness for Water Street Rescue Mission! I know that not folks seek help there, but it is great to know that it is available. I amazed that you can purchase health insurance for your dog or cat, but a living breathing person cannot receive simple health care. You truly do care for that population and more people need to now about the need instead of brushing it under the rug.
ReplyDelete